Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10]
91
Whilst you're at it take a look at this too....

http://www.steam-museum.org.uk/one_swindon_cabinet_report_081210.pdf

Whilst reading be careful of the tense. SBC has a habit in these documents, of using present tense instead of future tense, when it comes to Outcomes, makes it look like it's already happening, leading to a false sense of security.

Interesting stuff - but haven't we heard it all before in various other guises !
Well I suppose we will have to wait and see how this works  :santa_afro:
92
No point explaining it.....besides this threads been trolled, partly by me and by you. Shall we get back to the original subject matter?
93
I choose not to eat meat (in part because I'm concerned about animal welfare issues).

However the next level in: if I did eat meat, I'd prefer it to be labelled as halal/kosher because I would choose not to buy it.... (again for animal welfare reasons). 

Moley
94
(PS - seeing as you decided to get all pedandic with Muggins and her mispelling of 'Trek', I thought that you might enjoy the following observation -
Quote
from Tha National
: you say? Was it from the Yorkshire edition?)

 :2funny:

It was actually Chav, not Muggins.

Another Tobes' fail.

:2funny:
95
only if you perceive it to be, besides you answered your own question in your question

 :2funny: :2funny:

Could you explain how it would be possible for me to answer a question that was posed directly to Tobes about his viewpoint.

not clever enough to work it out yourself?  :santa_cheesy:

Obviously not. I'm sure you are though, explain away...
96
only if you perceive it to be, besides you answered your own question in your question

 :2funny: :2funny:

Could you explain how it would be possible for me to answer a question that was posed directly to Tobes about his viewpoint.

not clever enough to work it out yourself?  :santa_cheesy:
97
OMG! You're priceless 20.

...in addition to the obvious irony of 20 entirely missing the self evident joke - which as Mellon points out is a perfect illustration in its own right, there is, in pointless answer to his/her/its own pointless question, the further evidence of his/her/its 24 postings to threads within the last 48 hours. Paranoid? Couldn't care less about TS or its consequence or relevence? Judge for yourselves kids!

Oh dear.

98
Quote
Not sure what your obsession with the Daily Mail is

ROFL! Its not my bible  :santa_azn:

I was merely pointing out that the way in which a story gets presented can be misleading, and I think most people agree (well, the informed ones at least) that the Bigot Mail is probably one of the best current examples of not letting balance get in the way of a good headline...

Quote
I very much doubt they'd be trying to whip up anti-Islamic sentiment.

I didn't say they were - merely that the way the story was presented gave the impression that large number of Jewish and Muslim people were enraged... It might not be the case at all. You seem very well informed. Are they?

Sorry, despite agreeing with you, it must be the result of some namby pamby left wing brainwashing that I had to sound a note of cogent caution...!! Damn!!

(Do you like talking to people and having a discussion - or do you prefer to listen to the echo of your own shouting?)

(PS - seeing as you decided to get all pedandic with Muggins and her mispelling of 'Trek', I thought that you might enjoy the following observation -
Quote
from Tha National
: you say? Was it from the Yorkshire edition?)

 :2funny:
99
OMG! You're priceless 20.

...in addition to the obvious irony of 20 entirely missing the self evident joke - which as Mellon points out is a perfect illustration in its own right, there is, in pointless answer to his/her/its own pointless question, the further evidence of his/her/its 24 postings to threads within the last 48 hours. Paranoid? Couldn't care less about TS or its consequence or relevence? Judge for yourselves kids!

100
only if you perceive it to be, besides you answered your own question in your question

 :2funny: :2funny:

Could you explain how it would be possible for me to answer a question that was posed directly to Tobes about his viewpoint.
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10]
Sorry, the copyright must be in the template.
Please notify this forum's administrator that this site is missing the copyright message for SMF so they can rectify the situation. Display of copyright is a legal requirement. For more information on this please visit the Simple Machines website.