51
Talkswindon WiFi Inquiry / Re: Adjournment Debate: Video and Full Text From Hansard
« Last Post by Geoff Reid on December 31, 2010, 02:24:41 pm »Bumpity-bump
Happy New Year WiFi'asco

Standard procedure.
Developer submits inflated application, Council refuses (with a wink), developer re-submits application with the amount of dwellings they wanted to build from the outset and the Council then pretends to begrudgingly claim that it's a much better application and starts to drop thinly veiled threats that if the current application doesn't go ahead then something worse may end up replacing it.
Not enough planning. Good God 20Eyes. have you turned socialist?
I've dragged this from the Adver comments section
The door was opened to the developers by the ill thought out proposals for a University on this site. The councillors were deluded ,as the University proposal was not real, just a cover for unwanted development.
The Council now needs to designate the whole area as a nature reserve and stop this nonsense of one application after another.
Cncr Greenhalgh seems to be in favour of the application and should be stopped from any involvement in it.
Sums it up for me. We certainly don't need this person addingpropogandanews to the percieved council forum.