Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10
51
Talkswindon WiFi Inquiry / Re: Adjournment Debate: Video and Full Text From Hansard
« Last Post by Geoff Reid on December 31, 2010, 02:24:41 pm »

Bumpity-bump

Happy New Year WiFi'asco  :santa_smiley:
52
The wonderful, balanced and intellectually unchallengable face that gazes out at you from the mirror?

Well, that is a coincidence. Me too!

I use a pseudonym. My name is really Tram.

Oh bugger.

53
Quote
Standard procedure.

Developer submits inflated application, Council refuses (with a wink), developer re-submits application with the amount of dwellings they wanted to build from the outset and the Council then pretends to begrudgingly claim that it's a much better application and starts to drop thinly veiled threats that if the current application doesn't go ahead then something worse may end up replacing it.

Totally agree. It's a process predicated around the con of appearing to serve the interests of the community.
54
Political News & Debate / Re: Nationwide Show A 0.4% Climb in House Prices
« Last Post by Mart on December 31, 2010, 02:11:36 pm »
What you would call 'better than a slap in the face with a wet haddock?

Your points of reference being?

Like all Governments the good news will be used as evidence of the success of the stirring fiscal fightback, probably within minutes of a piece of bad news being produced as evidence for the need for a stirring fiscal fightback.

Like all normal people we will interpret what it means as it directly relates to us if it's even relevant.

55
Shouldn't he be taking the ink blot test?

Yes.

Ink blot won by a short head.
56
Not enough planning. Good God 20Eyes. have you turned socialist?

I'm not sure what planning has to do with Socialism.
57
"That's the problem with Planning Applications, always too many applications and not enough planning."

Not enough planning. Good God 20Eyes. have you turned socialist?
58
:bottom:
I've dragged this from the Adver comments section

The door was opened to the developers by the ill thought out proposals for a University on this site. The councillors were deluded ,as the University proposal was not real, just a cover for unwanted development.
The Council now needs to designate the whole area as a nature reserve and stop this nonsense of one application after another.
Cncr Greenhalgh seems to be in favour of the application and should be stopped from any involvement in it.


Sums it up for me. We certainly don't need this person adding
propoganda news to the percieved council forum. :bottom:

Actually the planned University development was real.

One wonders now if the University in the long run would have been a better option
59
That's the problem with Planning Applications, always too many applications and not enough planning.
60
 :bottom:
I've dragged this from the Adver comments section

The door was opened to the developers by the ill thought out proposals for a University on this site. The councillors were deluded ,as the University proposal was not real, just a cover for unwanted development.
The Council now needs to designate the whole area as a nature reserve and stop this nonsense of one application after another.
Cncr Greenhalgh seems to be in favour of the application and should be stopped from any involvement in it.


Sums it up for me. We certainly don't need this person adding
propoganda news to the percieved council forum. :bottom:
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10
Sorry, the copyright must be in the template.
Please notify this forum's administrator that this site is missing the copyright message for SMF so they can rectify the situation. Display of copyright is a legal requirement. For more information on this please visit the Simple Machines website.